aviation cable factory

What Are the Chemical Resistance Properties of Aviation Cable?

Aviation cables are the critical nervous system of any aircraft, transmitting power and signals in demanding environments. ​Chemical resistance is a non-negotiable property for these vital components, directly impacting safety, reliability, and longevity. Understanding how different aviation cable constructions withstand exposure to fluids common in aviation operations is essential for specification, maintenance, and safe operation.

Why Chemical Resistance Matters in Aviation

Aircraft are exposed to a wide range of potentially corrosive or degrading chemicals during normal operation, maintenance, and repair. Exposure to incompatible chemicals can lead to:

1. ​Insulation/Sheath Degradation: Swelling, softening, cracking, brittleness, or loss of mechanical strength.
2. ​Material Dissolution: Direct chemical attack leading to pitting or thinning of insulation/sheath.
3. ​Electrical Failure: Compromised insulation leading to short circuits, signal interference, or complete loss of function.
4. ​Reduced Lifespan: Accelerated aging and premature cable failure, demanding costly replacements and increasing downtime.

Common Aviation Chemicals and Fluids

Aviation cables may encounter numerous substances, including:

• ​Fuels: Jet Fuel (e.g., Jet A, Jet A-1), Avgas (e.g., 100LL), Fuel Additives
• ​Hydraulic Fluids: Types based on composition (e.g., Skydrol® LD-4/5 – Phosphate Ester), MIL-PRF-83282, MIL-PRF-5606 (Mineral Oil-based), newer eco-types.
• ​Lubricants: Engine oils, greases, general-purpose lubricants.
• ​Deicing/Anti-Icing Fluids: Ethylene Glycol (EG), Propylene Glycol (PG) based fluids, and anti-icing holdover fluids.
• ​Cleaning Solvents: Aviation cleaning compounds, degreasers, methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), toluene, isopropyl alcohol.
• ​Coolants: Engine coolants (often glycol-based).
• ​Fire-Resistant Fluids: Like those used in lavatory systems.
• ​Water/Salt Spray: Especially near coastal operations or during flight.

Factors Influencing Chemical Resistance

A cable’s resistance depends on several key factors:

1. ​Material Composition: The primary determinant. Different polymers and elastomers have vastly different chemical compatibilities.
2. ​Exposure Concentration: Higher concentrations are generally more aggressive.
3. ​Exposure Duration: Prolonged immersion or repeated exposure poses more risk than a brief splash.
4. ​Temperature: Chemical resistance generally decreases as temperature increases. Elevated temps accelerate degradation.
5. ​Mechanical Stress: A cable under tension or flexing while exposed to chemicals may degrade faster.
6. ​Chemical Mixtures: Interactions between different fluids can be unpredictable and more aggressive than single exposures.

Key Cable Component Materials and Their Resistance

Chemical resistance varies significantly between the core materials used in aviation cable insulation and jackets:

1. ​Polyimide (Kapton®) Film:
   • Pros: Excellent resistance to fuels (jet fuel, Avgas), most oils, solvents (MEK, toluene), acids, bases, radiation. High temperature capability.
   • Cons: Poor resistance to hydrolysis (steam/water under pressure). Can be mechanically sensitive. Often used as an inner wrap, not the primary external jacket.
2. ​Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE – Teflon®):
   • Pros: Exceptional broad-spectrum chemical resistance – withstands virtually all fuels, oils, solvents, acids, and bases. Excellent high-temperature performance. Low coefficient of friction.
   • Cons: More expensive, less mechanically robust against abrasion and cut-through than some options. Can suffer from “cold flow” under pressure.
3. ​Fluorinated Ethylene Propylene (FEP – Teflon® FEP):
   • Pros: Excellent chemical resistance, similar but slightly less broad than PTFE. Superior resistance to Skydrol® compared to many alternatives. Good high-temp rating. Easier to process (extrude) than PTFE.
   • Cons: Less thermally stable than PTFE at very high temps. Can be harder to strip.
4. ​Ethylene Tetrafluoroethylene (ETFE – Tefzel®):
   • Pros: Excellent resistance to hydrocarbons (fuels, oils), acids, bases, many solvents, and crucially, ​outstanding resistance to Skydrol® and other phosphate ester hydraulic fluids. Excellent mechanical toughness and abrasion resistance. Good high-temperature performance.
   • Cons: Less resistant to certain strong solvents than PTFE/FEP. Can be more expensive than PVC or some nylons.
5. ​Cross-Linked Polyethylene (XLPE):
   • Pros: Good resistance to water, acids, bases, alcohol, moderate fuels/oils. Excellent electrical properties. Cost-effective.
   • Cons: Poor resistance to hydrocarbons (like jet fuel and oils) over time, strong oxidizing acids, and many solvents. Typically used for internal components, not outer jackets in high-risk areas.
6. ​Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC):
   • Pros: Moderate resistance to water, acids, bases, alcohols. Low cost. Flexible.
   • Cons: ​Generally poor resistance to fuels, oils, Skydrol®, and many solvents. Plasticizers can leach out. Limited high-temperature capability. Less common in modern primary aircraft cable applications but might be found in specific low-risk interiors or galleys. Avoid for critical flight systems.
7. ​Nylon: (Often used as an overjacket on primary insulation)
   • Pros: Good mechanical toughness, abrasion resistance. Fair resistance to hydrocarbons (fuels/oils) and solvents compared to PVC. Good flex life.
   • Cons: Absorbs moisture, degrading electrical properties and dimensional stability. Poor resistance to strong acids and oxidizing agents. Degrades significantly when exposed to Skydrol®. Commonly used as an abrasion-resistant overlay.

Comparison of Common Aviation Cable Jacket Materials Against Key Chemicals

Note: “Excellent” indicates minimal effect, “Good” indicates minor effect generally acceptable for service, “Fair” indicates noticeable effect requiring caution/protection, “Poor” indicates significant degradation – generally unsuitable.

Best Practices and Selection Guidance

1. ​Consult Specifications: Always refer to aircraft manufacturer manuals (MM, AMM), component maintenance manuals (CMM), and regulatory standards (FAA, EASA). AS22759 (US Military Aerospace) cables have detailed chemical resistance requirements.
2. ​Identify Exposure Risks: Determine exactly which chemicals the cable will encounter in its specific location (e.g., hydraulic lines = Skydrol® resistance critical; engine nacelle = fuel, oil, heat resistance critical).
3. ​Prioritize Fluoropolymers: For critical areas with high chemical exposure risk (landing gear bays, engine areas, near hydraulic lines), fluoropolymer-insulated and jacketed cables (PTFE, FEP, ETFE) are the standard choices due to their superior broad-spectrum resistance, especially against Skydrol® and fuels.
4. ​Verify Temperature Ratings: Ensure the cable’s chemical resistance ratings apply to the operating temperatures it will experience. Resistance decreases with heat.
5. ​Consider Mechanical Needs: Choose materials that balance chemical resistance with required abrasion, cut-through, and flexural strength (ETFE often offers a good balance).
6. ​Visual Inspection & Maintenance: Regularly inspect cables in high-exposure zones for signs of damage, swelling, cracking, discoloration, or stiffening. Replace compromised cables immediately. Ensure seals and grommets protect cable ends.
7. ​Beware of Wickings: Avoid organic fiber wickings (like cotton) in cable bundles within high-risk zones as they can absorb and retain aggressive fluids, accelerating degradation of nearby cables.

Conclusion

The chemical resistance properties of aviation cable are foundational to aircraft airworthiness and operational safety. Choosing cables with insulation and jacketing materials explicitly designed to withstand the specific cocktail of fuels, hydraulic fluids, deicers, and solvents encountered in flight and maintenance operations is paramount. ​Fluoropolymers like PTFE, FEP, and particularly ETFE (Tefzel®) consistently demonstrate the high-performance chemical resistance essential for the demanding aerospace environment. Rigorous adherence to specifications, careful risk assessment, and proactive maintenance are key to ensuring aviation cable systems function reliably in the face of chemical challenges throughout their service life.

FAQs: Aviation Cable Chemical Resistance

• ​Q: What is the most important chemical resistance for aviation cable?
  A: Resistance to the aircraft’s ​primary hydraulic fluid (especially phosphate esters like Skydrol®) and ​jet fuel is absolutely critical, as exposure to these is common in many critical zones. Materials like ETFE, FEP, and PTFE excel here.
• ​Q: Why is Skydrol® so challenging for cables?
  A: Skydrol® is a phosphate ester-based fluid that is highly aggressive. It rapidly degrades standard materials like PVC and nylon, causing swelling and softening. Only specific high-performance fluoropolymers reliably resist it.
• ​Q: Can I use automotive cable in an airplane?
  A: ​No. Automotive cable typically lacks the stringent requirements for weight, flammability, smoke toxicity, temperature range, and crucially, the specific ​chemical resistance to aviation fluids like Skydrol® required for aircraft safety.
• ​Q: How does temperature affect chemical resistance?
  A: Chemical attack and degradation processes accelerate significantly with ​increasing temperature. Always ensure the cable’s rated temperature range covers the operational environment, considering both ambient heat and proximity to engines/APUs.
• ​Q: What should I look for during a chemical resistance inspection?
  A: Check for ​swelling (change in diameter/fit), ​softening/stiffening, ​cracking, ​discoloration, or ​surface tackiness on the cable jacket or insulation. Any of these indicate potential degradation and warrant replacement.